Dynamic Data Scaling Techniques for Streaming Machine Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55938/ijgasr.v3i1.68

Keywords:

Adaptive Scaling Methods, Changing Data Patterns, Scaling Parameters, Dynamic Data Scaling, Predictive Accuracy

Abstract

This research delves into innovative dynamic data scaling techniques designed for streaming machine learning environments. In the realm of real-time data streams, conventional static scaling methods may encounter challenges in adapting to evolving data distributions. To overcome this hurdle, our study explores dynamic scaling approaches capable of adjusting and optimizing scaling parameters dynamically as the characteristics of incoming data shift over time. The objective is to augment the performance and adaptability of machine learning models in streaming scenarios by ensuring that the scaling process remains responsive to changing patterns in the data. Through empirical evaluations and comparative analyses, the study aims to showcase the efficacy of the proposed dynamic data scaling techniques in enhancing predictive accuracy and sustaining model relevance in dynamic and fast-paced streaming environments. This research contributes to the advancement of scalable and adaptive machine learning methodologies, particularly in applications where timely and accurate insights from streaming data are crucial.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hardi M., Mohammed S.U.U., Rashid T.A. A Systematic and Meta-Analysis Survey of Whale Optimization Algorithm. Comput. Intell. Neurosci. 2019, 2019, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8718571

Storn R., Price K. Differential Evolution—A Simple and Efficient Heuristic for global Optimization over Continuous Spaces. J. Glob. Optim. 1997, 11, 341–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008202821328

Caraffini F., Kononova A.V. Structural bias in differential evolution: A preliminary study. AIP Conf. Proc. 2019, 2070, 020005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5089972

Caraffini F., Kononova A.V., Corne D. Infeasibility and structural bias in Differential Evolution. Inf. Sci. 2019, 496, 161–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.019

Mirjalili S., Lewis A. The Whale Optimization Algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 2016, 95, 51–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008

Yang X.S. A New Metaheuristic Bat-Inspired Algorithm. Nat. Inspired Coop. Strateg. Optim. 2010, 284, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12538-6_6

Chen G., Luo W., Zhu T. Evolutionary clustering with differential evolution. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC), Beijing, China, 6–11 July 2014; pp. 1382–1389. [Google Scholar] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/CEC.2014.6900488

Carnein M., Trautmann H. evoStream—Evolutionary Stream Clustering Utilizing Idle Times. Big Data Res. 2018, 14, 101–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bdr.2018.05.005

Nasiri J., Khiyabani F. A Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA) approach for Clustering. Cogent Math. Stat. 2018, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/25742558.2018.1483565

Nandy S., Sarkar P. Chapter 8–Bat algorithm–based automatic clustering method and its application in image processing. In Bio-Inspired Computation and Applications in Image Processing; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 157–185. [Google Scholar] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-804536-7.00008-9

Kokate U., Deshpande A., Mahalle P., Patil P. Data Stream Clustering Techniques, Applications, and Models: Comparative Analysis and Discussion. Big Data Cogn. Comput. 2018, 2, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc2040032

Cao F., Ester M., Qian W., Zhou A. Density based Clustering over an Evolving Data Stream with Noise. In Proceedings of the 2006 SIAM Conference on Data Mining, Bethesda, MD, USA, 20–22 April 2006; Volume 2006, pp. 328–339. [Google Scholar]

Sun J., Fujita H., Chen P., Li H. Dynamic financial distress prediction with concept drift based ontime weighting combined with Adaboost support vector machine ensemble. Knowl. Based Syst. 2017, 120, 4–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2016.12.019

Brzezinski D., Stefanowski J. Prequential AUC: Properties of the area under the ROC curve for data streams with concept drift. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2017, 52, 531–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-017-1022-8

ZareMoodi P., Kamali Siahroudi S., Beigy H. Concept-evolution detection in non-stationary data streams: A fuzzy clustering approach. Knowl. Inf. Syst. 2019, 60, 1329–1352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-018-1266-y

Published

2024-04-04

How to Cite

Kaushik, P. (2024). Dynamic Data Scaling Techniques for Streaming Machine Learning. International Journal for Global Academic & Scientific Research, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.55938/ijgasr.v3i1.68