Ethical Decision Making in Soft lifting-A UAE Based Case Study

Beenu Mago; Amira Abdullahi Aideed; Hassan Salim Al Ali; Sultan Saeed Alnuaimi; Fahad Rashid Al Qahtani

doi:10.55938/ijgasr.v1i2.9

Authors

Beenu Mago Skyline University College
Amira Abdullahi Aideed
Hassan Salim Al Ali
Sultan Saeed Alnuaimi
Fahad Rashid Al Qahtani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55938/ijgasr.v1i2.9

Keywords:

Soft lifting, Ethical Computer Self-Efficacy (ECSE), Ethics, Self-viability, Self-adequacy

Abstract

Soft lifting is a type of software piracy that is prevalent in today's computer-dependent world. Soft lifting is a type of software piracy in which software is installed or duplicated in a system in violation of its license agreement. In software development, ethical decisions are critical, as they have a significant impact on end users, organizations, and the environment. As the problem of copying affects soft lifting behaviour, the research lends some credence to the postulates model. Most notably, the study found that one's ethical perspective of soft lifting has no bearing on one's softlifting activity. These findings have significant implications for both software companies and academics who are aiming to prevent piracy through ethics education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bateman, C. R., Valentine, S., &Rittenburg, T. (2013). Ethical Decision Making in a Peer-to-Peer File Sharing Situation: The Role of Moral Absolutes and Social Consensus. Journal of Business Ethics, 115(2), 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1388-1

Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business Research Methods 3e. OUP Oxford.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE.

Eisend, M. (2019). Morality Effects and Consumer Responses to Counterfeit and Pirated Products: A Meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 154(2), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3406-1

Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model. Academy of Management Review, 16(2), 366–395. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4278958

Kumar, R. (1999). Research Methodology: A Step-by-Step Guide for Beginners. SAGE Publications.

Kuo, F.-Y., & Hsu, M.-H. (2001). Development and Validation of Ethical Computer Self-Efficacy Measure: The Case of Softlifting. Journal of Business Ethics, 32(4), 299–315. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010715504824

Loyens, K., &Maesschalck, J. (2010). Toward a Theoretical Framework for Ethical Decision Making of Street-Level Bureaucracy: Existing Models Reconsidered. Administration & Society, 42(1), 66–100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710362524

Making Ethical Decisions: Process. (n.d.-a). Retrieved February 1, 2021, from https://blink.ucsd.edu/finance/accountability/ethics/process.html

Making Ethical Decisions: Process. (n.d.-b). Retrieved February 1, 2021, from https://blink.ucsd.edu/finance/accountability/ethics/process.html

McNamara, A., Smith, J., & Murphy-Hill, E. (2018). Does ACM’s code of ethics change ethical decision making in software development? Proceedings of the 2018 26th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 729–733. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236024.3264833

Moores& Chang. (2006). Ethical Decision Making in Software Piracy: Initial Development and Test of a Four-Component Model. MIS Quarterly, 30(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148722

Phau, I., & Ng, J. (2010). Predictors of Usage Intentions of Pirated Software. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(1), 23–37.

Pirated software opens UAE to hackers. (2012, October 27). The National. https://www.thenationalnews.com/business/technology/pirated-software-opens-uae-to-hackers-1.382779

Pitesa, M., &Thau, S. (2013). Compliant Sinners, Obstinate Saints: How Power and Self-Focus Determine the Effectiveness of Social Influences in Ethical Decision Making. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 635–658. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0891

Sekaran, U., & Bougie, R. (2016). Research Methods For Business: A Skill Building Approach. John Wiley & Sons.

Tang, J.-H., &Farn, C.-K. (2005). The Effect of Interpersonal Influence on Softlifting Intention and Behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 56(2), 149–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-2170-9

Techo, V. (2016). Research Methods-Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed methods. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.1262.4886

The Dangers of Pirated Software and the Risks for Employers. (n.d.). Al Tamimi & Company. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://www.tamimi.com/law-update-articles/the-dangers-of-pirated-software-and-the-risks-for-employers/

Thong, J. Y. L., & Yap, C.-S. (1998). Testing an Ethical Decision-Making Theory: The Case of Soft lifting. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 213–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1998.11518203

Wagner, S. C., & Sanders, G. L. (2001). Considerations in Ethical Decision-Making and Software Piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1/2), 161–167. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006415514200

WAM. (n.d.). UAE has zero tolerance for software piracy—News—Government—Emirates24|7. Retrieved February 3, 2021, from https://www.emirates247.com/news/government/uae-has-zero-tolerance-for-software-piracy-2011-03-28-1.374029

What is softlifting? - Definition from WhatIs.com. (n.d.). WhatIs.Com. Retrieved February 1, 2021, from https://whatis.techtarget.com/definition/softlifting

Zangana, H. M., Al-Shaikhli, I. F., &Graha, Y. I. (2013). The Ethical Dilemma of Software Piracy: An Inquiry from an Islamic Perspective. CCIT Journal, 7(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.33050/ccit.v7i1.171